News

28 February 2022

Foundations of Chemistry, OnlineFirst, 11 February 2022

06 February 2022

Tenure-track assistant professor or associate professor

25 January 2022

Samuel Schindler and former CSS postdoc Pierre Saint-Germier got their paper "Putting Philosophical Expertise to the Test" accepted for publication at the Australasian Journal of Philosophy.

17 January 2022

"Ike's folly" by David M. Watry, Metascience, Online First, 13 January 2022

04 January 2022

Syntese, vol. 199, 10475–10498 (2021)

23 November 2021

The Joint Committee for Nordic Research Councils in the Humanities and Social Sciences (NOS-HS) is funding three workshops for “Establishing the Nordic Network for Philosophy of Physics: Towards a Future-Orientated Philosophy of Science”. Samuel Schindler is part of the group that successfully applied for this funding.

10 November 2021

Science & You Conference, Metz, France, 16-19 November 2021

09 November 2021

Metascience, Online First, 27 October 2021

27 October 2021

Tuesday 2 November, 11:00 am – 12 noon CET, online

25 October 2021

Reassessing Scientific Collaboration: A Final Workshop, Museo Nazionale Scienza e Tecnologia Leonardo da Vinci, Milan, 28 October 2021

Centre for Science Studies

New article by Brad Wray: What happened when chemists came to classify elements by their atomic number?

Full-time position announced at Centre for Science Studies

New publication by Samuel Schindler on philosophical expertise in AJP

Review of Kristian H. Nielsen and Henry Nielsen's book on Camp Century in Metascience

New journal article by Jessica Carter: “Free rides” in Mathematics

Funding for Nordic Network for Philosophy of Physics

Kristian H. Nielsen to present in symposium on "Science communication and scientism, a historical perspective"

New book review by Brad Wray: Small Bohr: A Review of J. Heilbron's Niels Bohr: A Very Short Introduction

Gitte Kragh to speak at GRACE Webinar: A Practical Guide to Citizen Science for Citizens and Researchers

Brad Wray presents his paper on The Epistemic Significance of the Size of Research Teams